Match statistics snapshot
- Cusco fired more attempts (16 vs 3 shots).
- Cusco was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cusco | Statistic | Academia Cantolao |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots off target |
| 0 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cusco | Statistic | Academia Cantolao |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 280Lead | Accurate passes | 271 |
| 328 | Total passes | 330Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cusco | Statistic | Academia Cantolao |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cusco | Statistic | Academia Cantolao |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cusco | Statistic | Academia Cantolao |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |