Match statistics snapshot
- Cusco created the clearer chances on xG (1.35 vs 0.47, Δ 0.88).
- Cusco fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Cusco was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cusco | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| 1.35Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.47 |
| 6 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 2Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cusco | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 391Lead | Accurate passes | 177 |
| 468Lead | Total passes | 252 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cusco | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cusco | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cusco | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| 1Lead | Red cards | 3 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |