Match statistics snapshot
- ADT created the clearer chances on xG (0.71 vs 0.94, Δ 0.23).
- Cusco fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- ADT was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 9%).
Cusco vs Adt
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cusco | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| 0.71 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.94Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
| 11Lead | Total shots | 10 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cusco | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 493Lead | Accurate passes | 192 |
| 558Lead | Total passes | 250 |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cusco | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cusco | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cusco | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |