Match statistics snapshot
- Cienciano created the clearer chances on xG (1.51 vs 1.62, Δ 0.11).
- Cienciano fired more attempts (22 vs 15 shots).
- Cienciano was more accurate in front of goal (41% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cusco | Statistic | Cienciano |
|---|---|---|
| 1.51 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.62Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 4 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 14Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cusco | Statistic | Cienciano |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 286Lead | Accurate passes | 267 |
| 348Lead | Total passes | 319 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cusco | Statistic | Cienciano |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cusco | Statistic | Cienciano |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 9Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cusco | Statistic | Cienciano |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |