Match statistics snapshot
- UTC Cajamarca fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Cusco was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 19%).
- Cusco held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cusco | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cusco | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 412Lead | Accurate passes | 305 |
| 464Lead | Total passes | 355 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cusco | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cusco | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cusco | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |