Match statistics snapshot
- CA River Plate was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 25%).
- CA River Plate held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Danubio | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target |
| 6Lead |
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Danubio | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Danubio | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Danubio | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Danubio | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 2 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |