Match statistics snapshot
- Danubio fired more attempts (9 vs 4 shots).
- Danubio held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Danubio | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 9Lead | Shots off target |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Danubio | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Danubio | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Danubio | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| Goalkeeper saves |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Danubio | Statistic | Ca River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |