Match statistics snapshot
- DC United created the clearer chances on xG (1.92 vs 1.17, Δ 0.75).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- DC United was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dc United | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1.92Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.17 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dc United | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 376Lead | Accurate passes | 375 |
| 444Lead | Total passes | 439 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dc United | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dc United | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dc United | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.