Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (1.43 vs 2.49, Δ 1.06).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (73% on target vs 20%).
- DC United held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dc United | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1.43 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.49Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 11Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dc United | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 429Lead | Accurate passes | 320 |
| 516Lead | Total passes | 397 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dc United | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dc United | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.04 | Goals prevented | 0.04 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dc United | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.