Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (0.69 vs 2.29, Δ 1.60).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dc United | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 0.69 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.29Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dc United | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 207 | Accurate passes | 372Lead |
| 302 | Total passes | 460Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dc United | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dc United | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| 0.45 | Goals prevented | 0.45 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dc United | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.