Match statistics snapshot
- DC United created the clearer chances on xG (1.71 vs 1.38, Δ 0.33).
- DC United was more accurate in front of goal (41% on target vs 12%).
- FC Cincinnati held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dc United | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 1.71Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.38 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 17 | Total shots | 17 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dc United | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 241 | Accurate passes | 338Lead |
| 324 | Total passes | 409Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dc United | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dc United | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dc United | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.