Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (1.42 vs 2.30, Δ 0.88).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (17 vs 15 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dc United | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1.42 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.30Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 7 | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dc United | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 280 | Accurate passes | 313Lead |
| 363 | Total passes | 400Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dc United | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dc United | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dc United | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.