Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (0.52 vs 0.60, Δ 0.08).
- DC United fired more attempts (9 vs 6 shots).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dc United | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.52 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.60Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dc United | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 357Lead | Accurate passes | 311 |
| 440Lead | Total passes | 394 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dc United | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dc United | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dc United | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |