Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (0.51 vs 1.14, Δ 0.63).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 14%).
- Nashville SC held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dc United | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.51 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.14Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dc United | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 308 | Accurate passes | 505Lead |
| 378 | Total passes | 563Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dc United | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dc United | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.02 | Goals prevented | 0.02 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dc United | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.