Match statistics snapshot
- DC United created the clearer chances on xG (2.03 vs 1.52, Δ 0.51).
- DC United fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- DC United was more accurate in front of goal (41% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dc United | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.03Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.52 |
| Offsides | ||
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dc United | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 238 | Accurate passes | 442Lead |
| 311 | Total passes | 509Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dc United | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dc United | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.10 | Goals prevented | 0.10 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dc United | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.