Match statistics snapshot
- Jong AZ fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- De Graafschap was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 23%).
- Jong AZ held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| De Graafschap | Statistic | Jong Az |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| De Graafschap | Statistic | Jong Az |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 251 | Accurate passes | 383Lead |
| 356 | Total passes | 477Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| De Graafschap | Statistic | Jong Az |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| De Graafschap | Statistic | Jong Az |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| De Graafschap | Statistic | Jong Az |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |