Match statistics snapshot
- Defensa Y Justicia created the clearer chances on xG (1.19 vs 0.42, Δ 0.77).
- Defensa Y Justicia fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Banfield was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Defensa Y Justicia | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 1.19Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.42 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Defensa Y Justicia | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 259 | Accurate passes | 319Lead |
| 332 | Total passes | 397Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Defensa Y Justicia | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Defensa Y Justicia | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.16 | Goals prevented | -0.16 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Defensa Y Justicia | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |