Match statistics snapshot
- Defensa Y Justicia fired more attempts (8 vs 6 shots).
- Banfield was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 38%).
- Defensa Y Justicia held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Defensa Y Justicia | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Defensa Y Justicia | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 450Lead | Accurate passes | 155 |
| 538Lead | Total passes | 245 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Defensa Y Justicia | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Defensa Y Justicia | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Defensa Y Justicia | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.