Match statistics snapshot
- Degerfors IF fired more attempts (22 vs 9 shots).
- Halmstad was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 32%).
- Degerfors IF held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 19Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 11 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 384Lead | Accurate passes | 318 |
| 471Lead | Total passes | 417 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |