Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby FF created the clearer chances on xG (1.01 vs 1.21, Δ 0.20).
- Degerfors IF fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Degerfors IF was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 1.01 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.21Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 30% | Ball possession | 70%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 175 | Accurate passes | 505Lead |
| 256 | Total passes | 591Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |