Match statistics snapshot
- Degerfors IF created the clearer chances on xG (1.82 vs 0.65, Δ 1.17).
- Degerfors IF fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Degerfors IF was more accurate in front of goal (23% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.82Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.65 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 278 | Accurate passes | 306Lead |
| 348 | Total passes | 383Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.