Match statistics snapshot
- IFK Goteborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.42 vs 2.23, Δ 0.81).
- IFK Goteborg fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- IFK Goteborg was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.42 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.23Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 385Lead | Accurate passes | 296 |
| 464Lead | Total passes | 378 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |