Match statistics snapshot
- Mjallby AIF fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 8%).
- Degerfors IF held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 400Lead | Accurate passes | 292 |
| 492Lead | Total passes | 385 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |