Match statistics snapshot
- Degerfors IF created the clearer chances on xG (0.88 vs 0.82, Δ 0.06).
- Mjallby AIF fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 0.88Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.82 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 242 | Accurate passes | 459Lead |
| 334 | Total passes | 557Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |