Match statistics snapshot
- Degerfors IF created the clearer chances on xG (1.57 vs 1.32, Δ 0.25).
- Degerfors IF fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Sirius was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Sirius |
|---|---|---|
| 1.57Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.32 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Sirius |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 407Lead | Accurate passes | 342 |
| 485Lead | Total passes | 422 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Sirius |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Sirius |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Sirius |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |