Match statistics snapshot
- Degerfors IF created the clearer chances on xG (2.51 vs 1.05, Δ 1.46).
- Degerfors IF fired more attempts (19 vs 14 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Sirius |
|---|---|---|
| 2.51Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.05 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Sirius |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 389Lead | Accurate passes | 365 |
| 473Lead | Total passes | 459 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Sirius |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Sirius |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Blocked shots | 7 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Sirius |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |