Match statistics snapshot
- Trelleborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.22 vs 2.02, Δ 0.80).
- Trelleborg fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Trelleborg held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Trelleborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.22 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.02Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Trelleborg |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 344 | Accurate passes | 424Lead |
| 411 | Total passes | 509Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Trelleborg |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Trelleborg |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Trelleborg |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |