Match statistics snapshot
- Degerfors IF created the clearer chances on xG (1.19 vs 0.42, Δ 0.77).
- Degerfors IF fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Degerfors IF was more accurate in front of goal (62% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Utsikten |
|---|---|---|
| 1.19Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.42 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Utsikten |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 276 | Accurate passes | 342Lead |
| 340 | Total passes | 429Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Utsikten |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Utsikten |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Degerfors If | Statistic | Utsikten |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.