Match statistics snapshot
- Delfin SC fired more attempts (17 vs 8 shots).
- Delfin SC was more accurate in front of goal (65% on target vs 50%).
- Delfin SC held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Delfin Sc | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Delfin Sc | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 68%Lead | Pass accuracy | 57% |
| 167Lead | Accurate passes | 128 |
| 245Lead | Total passes | 226 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Delfin Sc | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Delfin Sc | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Delfin Sc | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |