Match statistics snapshot
- Dender created the clearer chances on xG (1.53 vs 1.49, Δ 0.04).
- Genk fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Genk was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dender | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 1.53Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.49 |
| 5 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dender | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 223 | Accurate passes | 389Lead |
| 311 | Total passes | 478Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dender | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dender | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.17 | Goals prevented | 0.17 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dender | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.