Match statistics snapshot
- Deportes Copiapo created the clearer chances on xG (0.85 vs 0.44, Δ 0.41).
- Deportes Copiapo was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 44%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Deportes Copiapo | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 0.85Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.44 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Deportes Copiapo | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 271Lead | Accurate passes | 269 |
| 347Lead | Total passes | 344 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Deportes Copiapo | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Deportes Copiapo | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Deportes Copiapo | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.