Match statistics snapshot
- Deportivo Cuenca created the clearer chances on xG (1.52 vs 1.00, Δ 0.52).
- Deportivo Cuenca fired more attempts (21 vs 7 shots).
- Macara was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Deportivo Cuenca | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| 1.52Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.00 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Deportivo Cuenca | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 349Lead | Accurate passes | 221 |
| 448Lead | Total passes | 304 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Deportivo Cuenca | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Deportivo Cuenca | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Deportivo Cuenca | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |
Statistics is not available yet.