Match statistics snapshot
- CFR 1907 Cluj created the clearer chances on xG (1.40 vs 1.48, Δ 0.08).
- CFR 1907 Cluj fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Dinamo Bucuresti was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 1.40 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.48Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 354 | Accurate passes | 381Lead |
| 447 | Total passes | 472Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.