Match statistics snapshot
- Dinamo Bucuresti created the clearer chances on xG (1.67 vs 0.39, Δ 1.28).
- Dinamo Bucuresti fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- Dinamo Bucuresti was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 1.67Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.39 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 7 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 452Lead | Accurate passes | 217 |
| 519Lead | Total passes | 290 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |