Match statistics snapshot
- Dinamo Bucuresti created the clearer chances on xG (1.89 vs 1.14, Δ 0.75).
- Dinamo Bucuresti fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- CFR 1907 Cluj was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 1.89Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.14 |
| 7 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 432Lead | Accurate passes | 224 |
| 517Lead | Total passes | 334 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.