Match statistics snapshot
- FCSB created the clearer chances on xG (0.64 vs 0.96, Δ 0.32).
- FCSB fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- FCSB was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 0.64 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.96Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 206 | Accurate passes | 367Lead |
| 293 | Total passes | 446Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dinamo Bucuresti | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.