Match statistics snapshot
- FC Copenhagen created the clearer chances on xG (1.07 vs 1.16, Δ 0.09).
- FC Copenhagen fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Dinamo Minsk was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dinamo Minsk | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 1.07 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.16Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dinamo Minsk | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 28% | Ball possession | 72%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 180 | Accurate passes | 611Lead |
| 259 | Total passes | 694Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dinamo Minsk | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dinamo Minsk | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.28 | Goals prevented | 0.28 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dinamo Minsk | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |