Match statistics snapshot
- Dinamo Zagreb fired more attempts (29 vs 8 shots).
- FC Thun was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 21%).
- Dinamo Zagreb held more of the ball (76% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dinamo Zagreb | Statistic | Fc Thun |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 18Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 16 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 29Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dinamo Zagreb | Statistic | Fc Thun |
|---|---|---|
| 76%Lead | Ball possession | 24% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 58% |
| 618Lead | Accurate passes | 134 |
| 702Lead | Total passes | 231 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dinamo Zagreb | Statistic | Fc Thun |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dinamo Zagreb | Statistic | Fc Thun |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dinamo Zagreb | Statistic | Fc Thun |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.