Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby created the clearer chances on xG (1.08 vs 2.47, Δ 1.39).
- Hammarby fired more attempts (21 vs 11 shots).
- Hammarby was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Djurgården | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 1.08 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.47Lead |
| 0 | Offsides | 0 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Djurgården | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 68%Lead |
| 253Lead | Accurate passes | 250 |
| 384Lead | Total passes | 368 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Djurgården | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Djurgården | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Djurgården | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.