Match statistics snapshot
- Rosengård W created the clearer chances on xG (1.38 vs 1.95, Δ 0.57).
- Rosengård W fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Djurgården was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Djurgården | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 1.38 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.95Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Djurgården | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 276 | Accurate passes | 426Lead |
| 344 | Total passes | 514Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Djurgården | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Djurgården | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Djurgården | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.