Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby FF created the clearer chances on xG (0.79 vs 1.29, Δ 0.50).
- Djurgardens IF fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Hammarby FF was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 0.79 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.29Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 341 | Accurate passes | 409Lead |
| 409 | Total passes | 483Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |