Match statistics snapshot
- Djurgardens IF created the clearer chances on xG (1.21 vs 0.82, Δ 0.39).
- Djurgardens IF was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.21Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.82 |
| 8 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5 |
| 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 303Lead | Accurate passes | 292 |
| 387 | Total passes | 387 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Ifk Goteborg |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.