Match statistics snapshot
- Djurgardens IF created the clearer chances on xG (1.66 vs 0.49, Δ 1.17).
- Djurgardens IF fired more attempts (13 vs 6 shots).
- Djurgardens IF was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Panathinaikos |
|---|---|---|
| 1.66Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.49 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Panathinaikos |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 364 | Accurate passes | 535Lead |
| 431 | Total passes | 606Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Panathinaikos |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Panathinaikos |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.32 | Goals prevented | -0.32 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Panathinaikos |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |