Match statistics snapshot
- Dundalk was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 43%).
- Dundalk held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dundalk | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dundalk | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 71%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 331Lead | Accurate passes | 249 |
| 466Lead | Total passes | 368 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dundalk | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dundalk | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dundalk | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |