Match statistics snapshot
- Dundalk fired more attempts (11 vs 3 shots).
- Dundalk was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dundalk | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target |
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dundalk | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 321 | Accurate passes | 360Lead |
| 420 | Total passes | 455Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dundalk | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dundalk | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dundalk | Statistic | Shelbourne |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |