Match statistics snapshot
- Dundalk created the clearer chances on xG (3.16 vs 0.88, Δ 2.28).
- Dundalk fired more attempts (25 vs 12 shots).
- Dundalk was more accurate in front of goal (48% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dundalk | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 3.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.88 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dundalk | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 252Lead | Accurate passes | 194 |
| 331Lead | Total passes | 301 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dundalk | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dundalk | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dundalk | Statistic | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.