Match statistics snapshot
- Dunkerque fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- Clermont Foot was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 27%).
- Dunkerque held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dunkerque | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dunkerque | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 401Lead | Accurate passes | 288 |
| 470Lead | Total passes | 360 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dunkerque | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dunkerque | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dunkerque | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |