Match statistics snapshot
- Quevilly fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- Quevilly was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 27%).
- Dunkerque held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dunkerque | Statistic | Quevilly |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 8 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dunkerque | Statistic | Quevilly |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 435Lead | Accurate passes | 234 |
| 534Lead | Total passes | 324 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dunkerque | Statistic | Quevilly |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dunkerque | Statistic | Quevilly |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dunkerque | Statistic | Quevilly |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |