Match statistics snapshot
- 1.
- FC Nürnberg created the clearer chances on xG (0.96 vs 1.21, Δ 0.25).
- 1.
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dynamo Dresden | Statistic | 1. Fc Nürnberg |
|---|---|---|
| 0.96 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.21Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 5Lead |
| 3 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dynamo Dresden | Statistic | 1. Fc Nürnberg |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 346 | Accurate passes | 361Lead |
| 431Lead | Total passes | 429 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dynamo Dresden | Statistic | 1. Fc Nürnberg |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dynamo Dresden | Statistic | 1. Fc Nürnberg |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dynamo Dresden | Statistic | 1. Fc Nürnberg |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.