Match statistics snapshot
- Rīgas FS created the clearer chances on xG (0.72 vs 1.11, Δ 0.39).
- Dynamo Kyiv fired more attempts (9 vs 7 shots).
- Dynamo Kyiv held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Dynamo Kyiv | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 0.72 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.11Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Dynamo Kyiv | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 613Lead | Accurate passes | 222 |
| 693Lead | Total passes | 287 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Dynamo Kyiv | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Dynamo Kyiv | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.45 | Goals prevented | -0.45 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Dynamo Kyiv | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.